Site Condition Severity Assessment and Insulator/Bushing Upgrade Strategy
Step-by-Step Approach:
-
Measure or Estimate Site Condition Severity:
- Environmental Factors: Assess the severity of environmental conditions such as pollution, humidity, temperature fluctuations, and salt spray (for coastal areas).
- Operational Data: Collect data on historical insulator performance, including flashover incidents, arcing, and contamination levels.
- Field Inspections: Conduct visual inspections to identify signs of degradation, such as tracking, erosion, and surface contamination.
-
Select Candidate Profile and Creepage Guidance:
- Creepage Distance Calculation: Based on the site condition severity, calculate the required creepage distance to ensure reliable insulation performance.
- Profile Selection: Choose an insulator profile that provides adequate leakage paths and resists water bridging. Alternating shed profiles are particularly effective in preventing continuous paths of conductive moisture.
-
Choose Applicable Laboratory Tests and Test Criteria:
- Pollution Withstand Tests: Perform laboratory tests to evaluate the insulator's ability to withstand pollution under simulated field conditions.
- Hydrophobicity Tests: Assess the hydrophobic properties of the insulator material, which can help reduce the risk of flashover in wet conditions.
- Mechanical Stress Tests: Ensure that the insulator can withstand mechanical stresses, especially if longer or heavier insulators are considered.
-
Verify/Adjust Candidates:
- Field Trials: Install a small number of candidate insulators in the field and monitor their performance over time.
- Adjustments: Based on the test results, make any necessary adjustments to the insulator design or material selection.
Two Options for Upgrading Insulators/Bushings:
-
Replacement of Existing Insulators with Higher Creepage Distance Units:
- Advantages:
- Provides a long-term solution by ensuring adequate creepage distance.
- Can improve overall system reliability and reduce maintenance costs.
- Disadvantages:
- Increased weight and higher initial costs due to longer leakage paths.
- May require structural modifications to support the heavier insulators.
- Installation downtime may be required.
-
Installation of Additional Creepage Boosters/Extenders:
- Description:
- Creepage boosters/extenders are polymeric skirts coated internally with a specially formulated compound. When heated, the skirt shrinks around and bonds onto the existing insulator sheds, increasing the effective diameter and creepage distance.
- Advantages:
- Cost-effective solution compared to replacing entire insulators.
- Minimal installation downtime, as the boosters can be added to existing insulators.
- Flexibility to change the shed profile, improving resistance to water bridging.
- Disadvantages:
- May not provide the same long-term durability as new insulators with higher creepage distance.
- Requires careful installation to ensure proper bonding and performance.
Water Bridging and Shed Profiles:
- Water Bridging: A continuous path of contaminated conductive moisture that can cause arcing and flashover. This is a common issue in polluted environments, especially when insulators have uniform shed profiles.
- Alternating Shed Profiles: By using insulators with alternating shed profiles, the risk of water bridging is significantly reduced. The irregular shape of the sheds disrupts the formation of continuous moisture paths, enhancing the insulator's performance in wet and contaminated conditions.
Visual Representation:
The provided image shows insulators with creepage boosters/extenders installed in a substation. These boosters increase the effective creepage distance and shed diameter, improving the insulator's ability to resist flashover and arcing in harsh environmental conditions.